I am almost positive this is an import and not Native American

Real vs. Fake
1

IMG_8576
IMG_85761920Ă—1920 387 KB

IMG_8573
IMG_85731920Ă—1920 434 KB
I was getting ready to take this necklace apart, because some of the bears are broken and the strings are breaking. I took pictures and then self identified that the bears are made of a composite and not turquoise. Decided to do a google lens search to validate this was an import. I saw someone has the exact necklace on a platform and says it is Zuni and is charging a lot of money for it. Can you let me know for sure if I am right. Cause if I am wrong I will not take it apart.

2

Are you able to post the photo you’re referring to that identified as Zuni and expensive? Would be very instructive to us.

I believe you’re on the right track that this is import, and a low grade one. The flat sides of the bears (not handcarved), the disproportionately skinny penshell (Philippines), the undersized and probably not sterling findings…all of this computes as inexpensive and import.

It’s not at all hard to find fraudulent/misleading sales of “fetish necklaces” online. In fact it’s way more common than not, unfortunately.

What was said about it when you purchased it? Can you share what you paid?

4 Likes
3

No, I am not able to share the photos of the one I was referring to unfortunately. I did identify it as identical to mine except mine has the broken bears. The undersized findings are the same as theirs as well. I just checked and it is no longer on this highly popular resale platform.

Mine was from an online auction. I purchased a huge bag of stones and this necklace was in it. I only paid $39 for a 20lb bag of mixed stones. It was mostly used natural stone jewelry. I take the used jewelry apart and re-use it or resell the stones.

Thank you so much for your time. I have one more piece to ask you all about. I really appreciate all the help

2 Likes