I like some of this collection for possible purchase. The rings have nice Turquoise so excited to share these. Their silverwork isn’t top noch but wondering if any were made pre 70s?
I like the bracelet. Seller asking $295. What would you date it? Thanks everyone.
6 Likes
That seems like a very reasonable price, no matter the age. Some do appear to be from the 1970’s-80’s.
The bracelet is very unique.
None of them have hallmarks?
5 Likes
Gosh I really like the rings, especially the first one. I have no idea on the age. My only caution for wearability would be the clasp on the bracelet. I had one like that which came apart, and I lost it within a week of buying it 
The bracelet looks like a newer style to me.
4 Likes
I agree with @fernwood, the price is quite reasonable! I’ d say they are likely from the 70s - 90s, but hard to know. The first piece is weird, really haphazard, funky stamping, but the shape is nice. Several of the other pieces appear better, have pretty turquoise and better silver work. I guess it depends on what you want. If you would like to get a better quality ring by a known jeweler and some prominence regarding its age, I’ wait and keep looking. If you like several of these and want a variety of turquoise, style and quality, IMO, not a bad buy 
3 Likes
I agree @nanc9354. IMO that is the nicest, most interesting ring.
3 Likes
Well, we certainly all have different tastes. That’s my least favorite, but maybe I just don’t like the shape; I keep thinking it looks like should be turned the other way. I think I actually like the two stone ring the best.
2 Likes
Well… Ended up buying these rings minus the smaller blue one, added another shown here making six in all. I have a weakness for the unique, for the Turquoise (which all looks American), for statement pieces, and for men’s sized rings, these are 9 thru 11. $66.6666666667 each lol - pretty sure I can almost tripple that : )
Thanks Everybody!
I will share clear pics of what markings I find once I get them home.
8 Likes
I like the patina on all of them, and the fact that they all appear to have thicker bands. I think you did well!
1 Like
@Ziacat
Thanks, I hope so -No more buying for awhile lol! The seller is in Texas -very nice person to talk to : )
1 Like
Agree. Thinking the same.
Edit: Disregard I like the horizontal position : ) I was thinking you were talking about the first green ring which I would wear upside down to the way it’s worn here.
1 Like
Ah, I get it. I think I would wear that ring the other direction also. I actually have a ring that shape, and I do wear it opposite how they’re wearing it.
I had a ring that was more horizontal, and it always kind of bugged me, because it just never looked quite right. That’s just me 
I eventually donated it.
1 Like
Ahahaha…I was thinking the same thing…but I like the ring without the hand! 
1 Like
Maybe it’s cuz we want to look like we have long elegant fingers, and the horizontal makes it look less that way. Or…maybe I’m just vain
2 Likes
Markings - crossed arrows, CC, C O X or COX .
@Ziacat there’s a nice surprise in the green stone -good eye lol.
Also showing this Blue T with dark red host, pyrite, and what looks like green and yellow quartz?
Happy with them all : )
4 Likes
I really like all of those, nice and chunky! I still love the double stone one best. Awesome buy!!
3 Likes