I thought it could be fun to share listings that are stunningly dead wrong about the “Native American” nature of the item. I don’t mean fakes resembling, I don’t mean the imports masquerading as–I mean the plainly ludicrous. For smiles only.
This one is of interest to me, because I actually have this exact same pendant, which I wrote about on this forum on the thread about what piece of turquoise was the first-ever and started it all for us.
Here’s an example of a seller misrepresenting what they’re selling (hopefully accidentally but I digress…). Other than some obvious clues (it’s Navajo in the title but also Zuni in the description?), they’ve guessed everything about this. I know that mine was bought at a tourist trap gift shop in the mid-70’s in North Carolina and it’s been too many years for me to say with absolute certainty since I was a child of 7 or 8 then, but I am 99% sure it is neither real turquoise nor real silver and as likely an import.
Here’s another one: chip inlay wasn’t invented until the late 60s, or so I learned from the good folks on this site! Also mass produced tourist pieces are surely not sandcast…
These are a mishmash of styles and random pieces of material. I wonder what makes the seller think they are anywhere near “over 100 years old” or “created by a master”. Asking price between $450-650!
Well, please be aware that eBay is also used to clean dirty money. When you see something that’s super overpriced, and somebody buys it, sometimes that is what is going on…laundering money.